Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stream_arbiter_flushable: Do not lock prio arbiter #222

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

niwis
Copy link
Collaborator

@niwis niwis commented May 15, 2024

Setting LockIn while ExtPrio = 1'b1 is disallowed by the rr_arb_tree and has no effect. Furthermore, locking a decision with a possibly lower priority violates the intent of the priority arbiter.

Therefore, clear the LockIn parameter for the priority arbiter.

Fixes #221.

Setting `LockIn` while `ExtPrio = 1'b1` is disallowed by the
`rr_arb_tree` and has no effect. Furthermore, locking a decision with a
possibly lower priority violates the intent of the priority arbiter.

Therefore, clear the `LockIn` parameter for the priority arbiter.

Signed-off-by: Nils Wistoff <[email protected]>
@niwis niwis requested review from micprog and paulsc96 May 15, 2024 12:18
Copy link
Member

@micprog micprog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@niwis niwis merged commit adda219 into master Jun 17, 2024
5 checks passed
@niwis niwis deleted the nw/unlock-prio-arb branch June 17, 2024 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

stream_arbiter with priority arbitration inherently violates assertion
3 participants